We did it, yβall! We went and saw Terrifier 2 so you donβt have to! Sure, Halloween is already a week gone, but Terrifier 2 has been so successful at cinemas that the smart money says itβll be Art the Clown sliding down your chimney this Christmas, with something for everybody in his black plastic bag full of rusty sharps, powerful sedatives, and ropes for suspending and binding.
Hold on a second βΒ you donβt know about Terrifier 2?? In brief, itβs the little horror movie that could. Slashing through its planned three-day theatrical run in early October, T2 has ridden a noxious cloud of gibbering word of mouth to six weeks (and counting) in theaters, with grosses passing $10mil this week βΒ not bad considering the $250K production budget and nonexistent marketing spend.
Why all the talk? In three words: Art the Clown. Heβs the charismatic super-sadist at the filmβs center, a compelling mix of Beetlejuice and a Brueghelian demon whose impish pantomime keeps you laughing right up until he starts hacking and slicing βΒ sometimes, confusingly, past that. Art is a pretty magnificent creation, and any shade thrown at T2 will inevitably be aimed at scenes from which Art is absent β for, to be honest, from many of them art is also absent. But honestly, who cares. Viewers need that downtime to recover their wits, and after watching Terrifier 2 in theaters a couple days ago and Terrifier [1] on the internet a couple days before that, we unreservedly recommend these films to anybody.
Anybody who likes vile, unrated, spectacular sadistic violence, that is. For the rest of you, please enjoy the milder pleasures of Stoop Chat #3, and take heart that your brave bloggists have done the difficult leg (and eye and ear) work so that you donβt have to. (Stoop Chat #3 contains mild spoilers, always mentioned immediately before they happen so you can skip or bail.)
Part 1: After We Watched Terrifier [1]
Part 2: After We Watched Terrifier 2
(Image generated by asking an A.I. to deface our pic using the prompt βevil clownβ)
Oi! Mateβ¦
Oi! Phlegm[at]hotmail.fr, mateβ¦ you subscribed to this newsletterβs pay tier in early September, and your accruing dues just funded a premium brewski that Keith made disappear a few days ago in a lovely little restaurant garden near his home. He has always loved the taste of beer, but Keith acknowledged there was something extra-sweet about this one, and he thought it had something to do with you, Phlegm[at]hotmail.fr, grabbing the tab. Merci.
ππΈ
Hmm, not a resounding endorsement π I agree, that is far too long for any horror film. They definitely work best at sub ninety minutes. I have questions, though. Is it as cliche-ridden as it sounds? Although, if you were serious about the whole mime aspect, I guess that might give it an edge. Where is he stalking his victims? Itβs hard to imagine a mime artist clown blending in with his surroundings. Also, are we talking the usual, hapless teenage victims? Michael Myers branched out a bit over the years, but theyβre still your typical horror fodder. I could go and find out for myself I suppose, but I donβt like to walk out of a film before the end and donβt like the idea of being trapped there for 2 hours plus!